i just caught this show on mtv called totally gay! and it was a bunch of celebrities who are gay and gay-friendly talking about how everything is so gay now and how great it is. and they all insisted that there are all these straight boys who are watching will and grace and suddenly gaining insight into how to groom themselves properly and how to behave so that women will like them better.
um. huh?
they talked to some hetboys who have recently started shaving their junk. is this a commodity which was previously exclusive to the gay market? because i have seen plenty of shaved junk in het porn flicks. these same men also have begun shaving their chests, arms, and legs because women allegedly like that better.
what the fuck are they talking about?
there were also some people pointing out how jackass has started “blurring the line” (ugh) between straight and gay because there are crazy men running around naked all the time and shooting each other in the asses with high-speed tennis ball machines.
i don’t know any gay men who engage in streaking or belong to clubs where shooting a tennis ball at someone’s butt is the main attraction. none at all.
i was sort of confused too. all those chicks who do their stories in the buff on naked news, are they exhibiting stereotypical dyke behavior? because it is somehow “gay” to be running around naked in public? i mean everybody knows that queers have no shame and don’t know how to behave properly in public, right?
to make it worse, cool people like gina gershon and melissa etheridge and john waters all were there, smiling and nodding like this is all okay stuff to assume. i wonder when was the last time melissa ran through a sporting goods store wearing only a jock strap and a hockey mask?
this really kind of offends me. i mean, yes, there are funny stereotypes that people joke about, like about gay men being better dancers or knowing how to accessorize better than straight men. but i always took exception to the phrase “straight-acting”, because in my book, the only true way anyone can look at you and think that you are straight is if they witness you having sex with the opposite sex. because isn’t that what “straight” is?
so many people describe gay men as “effeminate” and lesbians as “masculine”. which is truthfully utter bullshit, because i have seen so-called “effeminate” gay men swishing around, and no straight woman i have ever seen walks with her wrist limp like that. so to say they are walking like a woman is just stupid. similarly, i don’t know any men who wear their hair like rosie o’donnell (well maybe those flock of seagulls guys), but her haircut is apparently “masculine”.
gay does not automatically mean that you are sensitive, or that you can cook, or that you know that forest green clashes with mint green. it can certainly mean all those things. but i have known some downright violent gay men, some who hated anal sex, and some whose personal hygiene and housekeeping abilities put the frat boys to shame. i also have known straight men who cook like martha fucking stewart and always have time to listen to whatever my latest bitch is. i have been a fag hag and a stag hag, and sexuality has nothing whatsoever to do with it, i swear.
i think it’s important to one’s self-identity to be able to fit into a category where certain things are concerned, like sex. a label like heterosexual or homosexual is also a very handy way to indicate to someone whether they would be remotely compatible with you, or if they are wasting their time buying you a drink because they are not what you are into.
but it is really fucking unnerving that labels which evolved as descriptors of one’s sexual preferences have become blanket terms which people assume detail one’s personality, choice of music, politics, and so on.
the million dollar question, of course, is what does society define as stereotypically “bisexual” behavior? this i just have to know.
and i’m sure if i watch mtv for another week, i’ll find out.